Science, Technology & Society in Seventeenth-Century England

318 indexed citations
published 1970
Journal
Medical Entomology and Zoology

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w19331437 →

Countries where authors are citing Science, Technology & Society in Seventeenth-Century England

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Science, Technology & Society in Seventeenth-Century England. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Science, Technology & Society in Seventeenth-Century England with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Science, Technology & Society in Seventeenth-Century England more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Science, Technology & Society in Seventeenth-Century England

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Science, Technology & Society in Seventeenth-Century England. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Science, Technology & Society in Seventeenth-Century England.

About Science, Technology & Society in Seventeenth-Century England

This paper, published in 1970, received 318 indexed citations . Written by Robert Κ. Merton covering the research area of History and Philosophy of Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (120 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (70 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (28 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w19331437.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026