The prevalence and correlates of untreated serious mental illness.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w1912320 →Countries where authors are citing The prevalence and correlates of untreated serious mental illness.
This map shows the geographic impact of The prevalence and correlates of untreated serious mental illness.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The prevalence and correlates of untreated serious mental illness. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The prevalence and correlates of untreated serious mental illness. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The prevalence and correlates of untreated serious mental illness.
This network shows the impact of The prevalence and correlates of untreated serious mental illness.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The prevalence and correlates of untreated serious mental illness..
About The prevalence and correlates of untreated serious mental illness.
This paper, published in 2001, received 549 indexed citations . Written by Ronald C. Kessler, Patricia A. Berglund, Martha L. Bruce, J. Randy Koch, Eugene Laska, Philip J. Leaf, R W Manderscheid, Robert A. Rosenheck and Ellen E. Walters covering the research area of Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (301 citations), Clinical Psychology (293 citations) and General Health Professions (163 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w1912320.