Physics Of Collective Beam Instabilities In High Energy Accelerators
- Authors
- Alexander W. Chao
- Journal
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w18639536 →Countries where authors are citing Physics Of Collective Beam Instabilities In High Energy Accelerators
This map shows the geographic impact of Physics Of Collective Beam Instabilities In High Energy Accelerators. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Physics Of Collective Beam Instabilities In High Energy Accelerators with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physics Of Collective Beam Instabilities In High Energy Accelerators more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Physics Of Collective Beam Instabilities In High Energy Accelerators
This network shows the impact of Physics Of Collective Beam Instabilities In High Energy Accelerators. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Physics Of Collective Beam Instabilities In High Energy Accelerators.
About Physics Of Collective Beam Instabilities In High Energy Accelerators
This paper, published in 1993, received 730 indexed citations . Written by Alexander W. Chao covering the research area of Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Aerospace Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (631 citations), Aerospace Engineering (538 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (307 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w18639536.