The explanation of organic diversity : the comparative method and adaptations for mating
- Authors
- Mark Ridley
- Journal
- Clarendon Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w18063894 →Countries where authors are citing The explanation of organic diversity : the comparative method and adaptations for mating
This map shows the geographic impact of The explanation of organic diversity : the comparative method and adaptations for mating. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The explanation of organic diversity : the comparative method and adaptations for mating with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The explanation of organic diversity : the comparative method and adaptations for mating more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The explanation of organic diversity : the comparative method and adaptations for mating
This network shows the impact of The explanation of organic diversity : the comparative method and adaptations for mating. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The explanation of organic diversity : the comparative method and adaptations for mating.
About The explanation of organic diversity : the comparative method and adaptations for mating
This paper, published in 1983, received 421 indexed citations . Written by Mark Ridley covering the research area of Genetics, Aquatic Science and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (263 citations), Genetics (151 citations) and Ecology (149 citations). Published in Clarendon Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w18063894.