The ecocriticism reader : landmarks in literary ecology
- Authors
- Cheryll GlotfeltyHarold Fromm
- Journal
- University of Georgia Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w18063624 →Countries where authors are citing The ecocriticism reader : landmarks in literary ecology
This map shows the geographic impact of The ecocriticism reader : landmarks in literary ecology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The ecocriticism reader : landmarks in literary ecology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The ecocriticism reader : landmarks in literary ecology more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The ecocriticism reader : landmarks in literary ecology
This network shows the impact of The ecocriticism reader : landmarks in literary ecology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The ecocriticism reader : landmarks in literary ecology.
About The ecocriticism reader : landmarks in literary ecology
This paper, published in 1996, received 556 indexed citations . Written by Cheryll Glotfelty and Harold Fromm covering the research area of Literature and Literary Theory. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Literature and Literary Theory (328 citations), Sociology and Political Science (135 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (100 citations). Published in University of Georgia Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w18063624.