Groupthink : psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes
- Authors
- Irving L. Janis
- Journal
- Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w18062015 →Countries where authors are citing Groupthink : psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes
This map shows the geographic impact of Groupthink : psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Groupthink : psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Groupthink : psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Groupthink : psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes
This network shows the impact of Groupthink : psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Groupthink : psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes.
About Groupthink : psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes
This paper, published in 1982, received 1.6k indexed citations . Written by Irving L. Janis. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (536 citations), Social Psychology (381 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (246 citations). Published in Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w18062015.