Pitfalls of quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
Impact in
- Genetics 94
Classified as
- Authors
- Stephen A. BustinTania Nolan
- Journal
- PubMed Central
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w18040110 →Countries where authors are citing Pitfalls of quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
This map shows the geographic impact of Pitfalls of quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pitfalls of quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pitfalls of quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Pitfalls of quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
This network shows the impact of Pitfalls of quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Pitfalls of quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction..
About Pitfalls of quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.
This paper, published in 2004, received 785 indexed citations . Written by Stephen A. Bustin and Tania Nolan covering the research area of Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (572 citations), Genetics (94 citations), Ecology (88 citations), Infectious Diseases (88 citations) and Cancer Research (88 citations). Published in PubMed Central.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w18040110.