Selected values of the thermodynamic properties of binary alloys
- Journal
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w18029901 →Countries where authors are citing Selected values of the thermodynamic properties of binary alloys
This map shows the geographic impact of Selected values of the thermodynamic properties of binary alloys. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Selected values of the thermodynamic properties of binary alloys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Selected values of the thermodynamic properties of binary alloys more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Selected values of the thermodynamic properties of binary alloys
This network shows the impact of Selected values of the thermodynamic properties of binary alloys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Selected values of the thermodynamic properties of binary alloys.
About Selected values of the thermodynamic properties of binary alloys
This paper, published in 1973, received 2.6k indexed citations . Written by Ralph Hultgren, Pramod D. Desai, Donald T. Hawkins, Molly Gleiser and K. K. Kelley covering the research area of Mechanical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Atmospheric Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Mechanical Engineering (1.6k citations), Materials Chemistry (974 citations) and General Materials Science (577 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w18029901.