A novel rapid assay for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene expression
- Authors
- Jürgen Neumann
- Journal
- BioTechniques
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w15100390 →Countries where authors are citing A novel rapid assay for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene expression
This map shows the geographic impact of A novel rapid assay for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene expression. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A novel rapid assay for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene expression with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A novel rapid assay for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene expression more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A novel rapid assay for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene expression
This network shows the impact of A novel rapid assay for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene expression. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A novel rapid assay for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene expression.
About A novel rapid assay for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene expression
This paper, published in 1987, received 740 indexed citations . Written by Jürgen Neumann covering the research area of Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (471 citations), Genetics (228 citations), Immunology (135 citations), Cancer Research (92 citations) and Virology (76 citations). Published in BioTechniques.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w15100390.