A simplified equation to predict glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w15080460 →Countries where authors are citing A simplified equation to predict glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine
This map shows the geographic impact of A simplified equation to predict glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A simplified equation to predict glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A simplified equation to predict glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A simplified equation to predict glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine
This network shows the impact of A simplified equation to predict glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A simplified equation to predict glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine.
About A simplified equation to predict glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine
This paper, published in 2000, received 1.5k indexed citations . Written by Andrew S. Levey, Juan P. Bosch, Shahriari Ali Reza and Nancy L. Rogers covering the research area of Nephrology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nephrology (907 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (342 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (219 citations). Published in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w15080460.