The mathematics of statistical machine translation: parameter estimation

2.7k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1993, received 2.7k indexed citations. Written by Peter F. Brown, Vincent J. Della Pietra, Stephen A. Della Pietra and Robert L. Mercer covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (2.6k citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (328 citations) and Information Systems (250 citations). Published in Computational Linguistics.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w13270664 →

Countries where authors are citing The mathematics of statistical machine translation: parameter estimation

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The mathematics of statistical machine translation: parameter estimation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The mathematics of statistical machine translation: parameter estimation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The mathematics of statistical machine translation: parameter estimation more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The mathematics of statistical machine translation: parameter estimation

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The mathematics of statistical machine translation: parameter estimation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The mathematics of statistical machine translation: parameter estimation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w13270664.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026