Functional MRI : an introduction to methods
- Journal
- Oxford University Press eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w12986323 →Countries where authors are citing Functional MRI : an introduction to methods
This map shows the geographic impact of Functional MRI : an introduction to methods. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Functional MRI : an introduction to methods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Functional MRI : an introduction to methods more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Functional MRI : an introduction to methods
This network shows the impact of Functional MRI : an introduction to methods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Functional MRI : an introduction to methods.
About Functional MRI : an introduction to methods
This paper, published in 2002, received 700 indexed citations . Written by Peter Jezzard, Paul M. Matthews and Stephen M. Smith covering the research area of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (519 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (157 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (112 citations). Published in Oxford University Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w12986323.