Proxy Signatures: Delegation of the Power to Sign Messages
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w12521374 →Countries where authors are citing Proxy Signatures: Delegation of the Power to Sign Messages
This map shows the geographic impact of Proxy Signatures: Delegation of the Power to Sign Messages. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Proxy Signatures: Delegation of the Power to Sign Messages with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Proxy Signatures: Delegation of the Power to Sign Messages more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Proxy Signatures: Delegation of the Power to Sign Messages
This network shows the impact of Proxy Signatures: Delegation of the Power to Sign Messages. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Proxy Signatures: Delegation of the Power to Sign Messages.
About Proxy Signatures: Delegation of the Power to Sign Messages
This paper, published in 1996, received 499 indexed citations . Written by Masahiro Mambo, Eiji Okamoto and Keisuke Usuda covering the research area of Accounting and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (466 citations), Information Systems (312 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (155 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (119 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (38 citations). Published in IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w12521374.