Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science

308 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1980, received 308 indexed citations. Written by Mary Hesse covering the research area of History and Philosophy of Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (88 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (58 citations) and Philosophy (53 citations). Published in The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w12287368 →

Countries where authors are citing Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w12287368.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026