Survey of gastrointestinal parasitism in Wisconsin dairy cattle.

215 indexed citations
published 1962

Impact in

Classified as

Authors
A. C. Todd
Journal
PubMed

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w118272 →

Countries where authors are citing Survey of gastrointestinal parasitism in Wisconsin dairy cattle.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Survey of gastrointestinal parasitism in Wisconsin dairy cattle.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Survey of gastrointestinal parasitism in Wisconsin dairy cattle. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Survey of gastrointestinal parasitism in Wisconsin dairy cattle. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Survey of gastrointestinal parasitism in Wisconsin dairy cattle.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Survey of gastrointestinal parasitism in Wisconsin dairy cattle.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Survey of gastrointestinal parasitism in Wisconsin dairy cattle..

About Survey of gastrointestinal parasitism in Wisconsin dairy cattle.

This paper, published in 1962, received 215 indexed citations . Written by A. C. Todd covering the research area of Small Animals and Parasitology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Small Animals (161 citations), Parasitology (84 citations), Ecology (59 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (54 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (33 citations). Published in PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w118272.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact