Managing small-scale fisheries : alternative directions and methods
- Journal
- Issue Lab (Candid)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w11763465 →Countries where authors are citing Managing small-scale fisheries : alternative directions and methods
This map shows the geographic impact of Managing small-scale fisheries : alternative directions and methods. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Managing small-scale fisheries : alternative directions and methods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Managing small-scale fisheries : alternative directions and methods more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Managing small-scale fisheries : alternative directions and methods
This network shows the impact of Managing small-scale fisheries : alternative directions and methods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Managing small-scale fisheries : alternative directions and methods.
About Managing small-scale fisheries : alternative directions and methods
This paper, published in 2001, received 579 indexed citations . Written by Fikret Berkes, Robin Mahon, Patrick McConney, Richard Β. Pollnac and Robert S. Pomeroy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology (345 citations), Global and Planetary Change (328 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (163 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (101 citations) and Aquatic Science (64 citations). Published in Issue Lab (Candid).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w11763465.