Do Transformers Really Perform Badly for Graph Representation

248 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2021, received 248 indexed citations. Written by Chengxuan Ying, Tianle Cai, Shengjie Luo, Shuxin Zheng, Guolin Ke, Di He, Yanming Shen and Tie‐Yan Liu covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (143 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (65 citations) and Molecular Biology (51 citations). Published in Neural Information Processing Systems.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w11687676 →

Countries where authors are citing Do Transformers Really Perform Badly for Graph Representation

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Do Transformers Really Perform Badly for Graph Representation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Do Transformers Really Perform Badly for Graph Representation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Do Transformers Really Perform Badly for Graph Representation more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Do Transformers Really Perform Badly for Graph Representation

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Do Transformers Really Perform Badly for Graph Representation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Do Transformers Really Perform Badly for Graph Representation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w11687676.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper A relaxor ferroelectric polymer with an ultrahigh dielectric constant largely promotes the dissociation of lithium salts to achieve high ionic conductivity Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Minor allele frequency thresholds strongly affect population structure inference with genomic data sets Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Comparative performance of the BGISEQ-500 vs Illumina HiSeq2500 sequencing platforms for palaeogenomic sequencing Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Limits to dark matter annihilation cross-section from a combined analysis of MAGIC and Fermi-LAT observations of dwarf satellite galaxies Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Production and characterization of biochar produced from slow pyrolysis of pigeon pea stalk and bamboo Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Molecular mechanisms of tumor resistance to radiotherapy Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a neurodegenerative disorder poised for successful therapeutic translation Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper GALEX–SDSS–WISE LEGACY CATALOG (GSWLC): STAR FORMATION RATES, STELLAR MASSES, AND DUST ATTENUATIONS OF 700,000 LOW-REDSHIFT GALAXIES Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Bacterial persistence promotes the evolution of antibiotic resistance by increasing survival and mutation rates Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper A Self‐Tuning Model for Smart Manufacturing SMEs: Effects on Digital Innovation
Rankless by CCL
2026