The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward to Inventive Activity
Impact in
- Finance 398
Classified as
- Authors
- Jack Hirshleifer
- Journal
- American Economic Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w11489535 →Countries where authors are citing The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward to Inventive Activity
This map shows the geographic impact of The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward to Inventive Activity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward to Inventive Activity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward to Inventive Activity more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward to Inventive Activity
This network shows the impact of The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward to Inventive Activity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward to Inventive Activity.
About The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward to Inventive Activity
This paper, published in 1971, received 916 indexed citations . Written by Jack Hirshleifer covering the research area of Management of Technology and Innovation. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (547 citations), Finance (398 citations), Accounting (304 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (189 citations) and Strategy and Management (103 citations). Published in American Economic Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w11489535.