Development and Structure of the Canadian Forest FireWeather Index System
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- C. E. Van Wagner
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w11249648 →Countries where authors are citing Development and Structure of the Canadian Forest FireWeather Index System
This map shows the geographic impact of Development and Structure of the Canadian Forest FireWeather Index System. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Development and Structure of the Canadian Forest FireWeather Index System with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Development and Structure of the Canadian Forest FireWeather Index System more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Development and Structure of the Canadian Forest FireWeather Index System
This network shows the impact of Development and Structure of the Canadian Forest FireWeather Index System. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Development and Structure of the Canadian Forest FireWeather Index System.
About Development and Structure of the Canadian Forest FireWeather Index System
This paper, published in 1987, received 555 indexed citations . Written by C. E. Van Wagner covering the research area of General Health Professions and Philosophy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (514 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (125 citations), Ecology (124 citations), Atmospheric Science (115 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (82 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w11249648.