OECD Skills Outlook 2013: First Results from the Survey of Adult Skills
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w11200910 →Countries where authors are citing OECD Skills Outlook 2013: First Results from the Survey of Adult Skills
This map shows the geographic impact of OECD Skills Outlook 2013: First Results from the Survey of Adult Skills. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by OECD Skills Outlook 2013: First Results from the Survey of Adult Skills with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites OECD Skills Outlook 2013: First Results from the Survey of Adult Skills more than expected).
Fields of papers citing OECD Skills Outlook 2013: First Results from the Survey of Adult Skills
This network shows the impact of OECD Skills Outlook 2013: First Results from the Survey of Adult Skills. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the OECD Skills Outlook 2013: First Results from the Survey of Adult Skills.
About OECD Skills Outlook 2013: First Results from the Survey of Adult Skills
This paper, published in 2013, received 419 indexed citations . Written by Richard Desjardins, William Thorn and Glenda Quintini covering the research area of Education and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (199 citations), Sociology and Political Science (103 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (86 citations). Published in Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w11200910.