Measuring plant-associated nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems

427 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2008, received 427 indexed citations. Written by M. Unkovich, D. F. Herridge, Mark B. Peoples, Georg Cadisch, K.E. Giller, Bruno José Rodrígues Alves and Phillip M. Chalk covering the research area of Plant Science and Soil Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (371 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (252 citations) and Soil Science (153 citations). Published in Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w11200463 →

Countries where authors are citing Measuring plant-associated nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Measuring plant-associated nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Measuring plant-associated nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Measuring plant-associated nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Measuring plant-associated nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Measuring plant-associated nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Measuring plant-associated nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w11200463.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026