Understanding the Main Phases of Developing a Maturity Assessment Model
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w11065393 →Countries where authors are citing Understanding the Main Phases of Developing a Maturity Assessment Model
This map shows the geographic impact of Understanding the Main Phases of Developing a Maturity Assessment Model. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Understanding the Main Phases of Developing a Maturity Assessment Model with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Understanding the Main Phases of Developing a Maturity Assessment Model more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Understanding the Main Phases of Developing a Maturity Assessment Model
This network shows the impact of Understanding the Main Phases of Developing a Maturity Assessment Model. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Understanding the Main Phases of Developing a Maturity Assessment Model.
About Understanding the Main Phases of Developing a Maturity Assessment Model
This paper, published in 2005, received 549 indexed citations . Written by Tonia de Bruin, Uday Kulkarni and Michael Rosemann covering the research area of Strategy and Management, Management Information Systems and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management Information Systems (275 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (150 citations) and Strategy and Management (129 citations). Published in Journal of the Association for Information Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w11065393.