Migration unemployment and development: a two-sector analysis.
- Authors
- Harris
- Journal
- American Economic Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w11035831 →Countries where authors are citing Migration unemployment and development: a two-sector analysis.
This map shows the geographic impact of Migration unemployment and development: a two-sector analysis.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Migration unemployment and development: a two-sector analysis. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Migration unemployment and development: a two-sector analysis. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Migration unemployment and development: a two-sector analysis.
This network shows the impact of Migration unemployment and development: a two-sector analysis.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Migration unemployment and development: a two-sector analysis..
About Migration unemployment and development: a two-sector analysis.
This paper, published in 1970, received 4.0k indexed citations . Written by Harris covering the research area of General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (2.3k citations), Sociology and Political Science (2.3k citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (610 citations). Published in American Economic Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w11035831.