New Developments in Models of Search in the Labor Market

401 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1999, received 401 indexed citations. Written by Dale T. Mortensen and Christopher A. Pissarides covering the research area of Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (365 citations), General Health Professions (72 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (71 citations). Published in London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w10516582 →

Countries where authors are citing New Developments in Models of Search in the Labor Market

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of New Developments in Models of Search in the Labor Market. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by New Developments in Models of Search in the Labor Market with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Developments in Models of Search in the Labor Market more than expected).

Fields of papers citing New Developments in Models of Search in the Labor Market

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of New Developments in Models of Search in the Labor Market. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the New Developments in Models of Search in the Labor Market.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w10516582.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026