A Class of Submodular Functions for Document Summarization
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Hui LinJeff Bilmes
- Journal
- Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w10426623 →Countries where authors are citing A Class of Submodular Functions for Document Summarization
This map shows the geographic impact of A Class of Submodular Functions for Document Summarization. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Class of Submodular Functions for Document Summarization with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Class of Submodular Functions for Document Summarization more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A Class of Submodular Functions for Document Summarization
This network shows the impact of A Class of Submodular Functions for Document Summarization. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Class of Submodular Functions for Document Summarization.
About A Class of Submodular Functions for Document Summarization
This paper, published in 2011, received 357 indexed citations . Written by Hui Lin and Jeff Bilmes covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (275 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (87 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (54 citations), Information Systems (42 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (36 citations). Published in Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w10426623.