Wildlife in a changing world : an analysis of the 2008 IUCN red list of threatened species
- Journal
- IUCN eBooks
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w10186624 →Countries where authors are citing Wildlife in a changing world : an analysis of the 2008 IUCN red list of threatened species
This map shows the geographic impact of Wildlife in a changing world : an analysis of the 2008 IUCN red list of threatened species. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wildlife in a changing world : an analysis of the 2008 IUCN red list of threatened species with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wildlife in a changing world : an analysis of the 2008 IUCN red list of threatened species more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Wildlife in a changing world : an analysis of the 2008 IUCN red list of threatened species
This network shows the impact of Wildlife in a changing world : an analysis of the 2008 IUCN red list of threatened species. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Wildlife in a changing world : an analysis of the 2008 IUCN red list of threatened species.
About Wildlife in a changing world : an analysis of the 2008 IUCN red list of threatened species
This paper, published in 2009, received 587 indexed citations . Written by Jean‐Christophe Vié, Craig Hilton‐Taylor and Simon N. Stuart covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology (318 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (231 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (180 citations). Published in IUCN eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w10186624.