Optimal decoding of linear codes for minimizing symbol error rate

3.3k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1974, received 3.3k indexed citations. Written by L.R. Bahl covering the research area of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (3.0k citations), Computer Networks and Communications (2.7k citations) and Artificial Intelligence (988 citations). Published in IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w10122760 →

Countries where authors are citing Optimal decoding of linear codes for minimizing symbol error rate

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Optimal decoding of linear codes for minimizing symbol error rate. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Optimal decoding of linear codes for minimizing symbol error rate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Optimal decoding of linear codes for minimizing symbol error rate more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Optimal decoding of linear codes for minimizing symbol error rate

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Optimal decoding of linear codes for minimizing symbol error rate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Optimal decoding of linear codes for minimizing symbol error rate.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w10122760.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026