Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities

529 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2005, received 529 indexed citations. Written by Mark J. Hovenden, Marcel Holyoak, Mathew A. Leibold and Robert D. Holt covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nature and Landscape Conservation (302 citations), Ecology (292 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (218 citations). Published in University of Chicago Press eBooks.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w10026381 →

Countries where authors are citing Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w10026381.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026