The value of academic Libraries: A comprehensive research review and report
- Authors
- Megan Oakleaf
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w9044604 →Countries where authors are citing The value of academic Libraries: A comprehensive research review and report
This map shows the geographic impact of The value of academic Libraries: A comprehensive research review and report. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The value of academic Libraries: A comprehensive research review and report with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The value of academic Libraries: A comprehensive research review and report more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The value of academic Libraries: A comprehensive research review and report
This network shows the impact of The value of academic Libraries: A comprehensive research review and report. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The value of academic Libraries: A comprehensive research review and report.
About The value of academic Libraries: A comprehensive research review and report
This paper, published in 2010, received 384 indexed citations . Written by Megan Oakleaf covering the research area of Information Systems and Library and Information Sciences. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Library and Information Sciences (240 citations), Information Systems (200 citations) and Education (86 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w9044604.