A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge
- Journal
- Educational Technology & Society
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w8137635 →Countries where authors are citing A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge
This map shows the geographic impact of A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge
This network shows the impact of A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge.
About A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge
This paper, published in 2013, received 433 indexed citations . Written by Ching Sing Chai, Joyce Hwee Ling Koh and Chin‐Chung Tsai covering the research area of Education, Safety Research and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (358 citations), Information Systems (152 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (78 citations). Published in Educational Technology & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w8137635.