Distribution of the folate receptor GP38 in normal and malignant cell lines and tissues.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w62696489 →Countries where authors are citing Distribution of the folate receptor GP38 in normal and malignant cell lines and tissues.
This map shows the geographic impact of Distribution of the folate receptor GP38 in normal and malignant cell lines and tissues.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Distribution of the folate receptor GP38 in normal and malignant cell lines and tissues. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Distribution of the folate receptor GP38 in normal and malignant cell lines and tissues. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Distribution of the folate receptor GP38 in normal and malignant cell lines and tissues.
This network shows the impact of Distribution of the folate receptor GP38 in normal and malignant cell lines and tissues.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Distribution of the folate receptor GP38 in normal and malignant cell lines and tissues..
About Distribution of the folate receptor GP38 in normal and malignant cell lines and tissues.
This paper, published in 1992, received 889 indexed citations . Written by Steven Weitman, Richard H. Lark, Leslie R. Coney, Daniel W. Fort, Verna Frasca, V R Zurawski and B A Kamen covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Oncology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (419 citations), Biomaterials (324 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (199 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w62696489.