Deprescribing proton pump inhibitors: Evidence-based clinical practice guideline.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w60551319 →Countries where authors are citing Deprescribing proton pump inhibitors: Evidence-based clinical practice guideline.
This map shows the geographic impact of Deprescribing proton pump inhibitors: Evidence-based clinical practice guideline.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deprescribing proton pump inhibitors: Evidence-based clinical practice guideline. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deprescribing proton pump inhibitors: Evidence-based clinical practice guideline. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Deprescribing proton pump inhibitors: Evidence-based clinical practice guideline.
This network shows the impact of Deprescribing proton pump inhibitors: Evidence-based clinical practice guideline.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Deprescribing proton pump inhibitors: Evidence-based clinical practice guideline..
About Deprescribing proton pump inhibitors: Evidence-based clinical practice guideline.
This paper, published in 2017, received 279 indexed citations . Written by Barbara Farrell, Kevin Pottie, Wade Thompson, Carlos Rojas‐Fernandez, Kenneth Walsh, Welch and Paul Moayyedi covering the research area of Gastroenterology and Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Gastroenterology (140 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (111 citations) and Surgery (96 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w60551319.