A simplified general method for cluster-sample surveys of health in developing countries.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w45810555 →Countries where authors are citing A simplified general method for cluster-sample surveys of health in developing countries.
This map shows the geographic impact of A simplified general method for cluster-sample surveys of health in developing countries.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A simplified general method for cluster-sample surveys of health in developing countries. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A simplified general method for cluster-sample surveys of health in developing countries. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A simplified general method for cluster-sample surveys of health in developing countries.
This network shows the impact of A simplified general method for cluster-sample surveys of health in developing countries.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A simplified general method for cluster-sample surveys of health in developing countries..
About A simplified general method for cluster-sample surveys of health in developing countries.
This paper, published in 1991, received 754 indexed citations . Written by S. Bennett, T. N. Woods and Daniel L. Smith covering the research area of Epidemiology, Health and Modeling and Simulation. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Epidemiology (172 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (167 citations) and Infectious Diseases (149 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w45810555.