Breast Cancer Cell Line Classification and Its Relevance with Breast Tumor Subtyping

778 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2017, received 778 indexed citations. Written by Xiaofeng Dai, Hongye Cheng, Zhonghu Bai and Jia Li covering the research area of Cancer Research and Oncology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (452 citations), Oncology (265 citations) and Cancer Research (183 citations). Published in Journal of Cancer.

Countries where authors are citing Breast Cancer Cell Line Classification and Its Relevance with Breast Tumor Subtyping

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Breast Cancer Cell Line Classification and Its Relevance with Breast Tumor Subtyping. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Breast Cancer Cell Line Classification and Its Relevance with Breast Tumor Subtyping with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Breast Cancer Cell Line Classification and Its Relevance with Breast Tumor Subtyping more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Breast Cancer Cell Line Classification and Its Relevance with Breast Tumor Subtyping

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Breast Cancer Cell Line Classification and Its Relevance with Breast Tumor Subtyping. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Breast Cancer Cell Line Classification and Its Relevance with Breast Tumor Subtyping.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.7150/jca.18457.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026