Prevalence of Burnout Syndrome in Emergency Nurses: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 226 indexed citations. Written by José Luis Gómez‐Urquiza, Emilia I. De la Fuente‐Solana, Luis Albendín‐García, Cristina Vargas, Elena Ortega‐Campos and Guillermo A. Cañadas‐De la Fuente covering the research area of General Health Professions and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (202 citations), Clinical Psychology (101 citations) and Social Psychology (59 citations). Published in Critical Care Nurse.

Countries where authors are citing Prevalence of Burnout Syndrome in Emergency Nurses: A Meta-Analysis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Prevalence of Burnout Syndrome in Emergency Nurses: A Meta-Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Prevalence of Burnout Syndrome in Emergency Nurses: A Meta-Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Prevalence of Burnout Syndrome in Emergency Nurses: A Meta-Analysis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Prevalence of Burnout Syndrome in Emergency Nurses: A Meta-Analysis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Prevalence of Burnout Syndrome in Emergency Nurses: A Meta-Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Prevalence of Burnout Syndrome in Emergency Nurses: A Meta-Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.4037/ccn2017508.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026