Selection and Comparative Advantage in Technology Adoption

428 indexed citations
published 2011
Authors
Tavneet Suri
Journal
Econometrica

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.3982/ecta7749 →

Countries where authors are citing Selection and Comparative Advantage in Technology Adoption

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Selection and Comparative Advantage in Technology Adoption. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Selection and Comparative Advantage in Technology Adoption with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Selection and Comparative Advantage in Technology Adoption more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Selection and Comparative Advantage in Technology Adoption

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Selection and Comparative Advantage in Technology Adoption. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Selection and Comparative Advantage in Technology Adoption.

About Selection and Comparative Advantage in Technology Adoption

This paper, published in 2011, received 428 indexed citations . Written by Tavneet Suri covering the research area of General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (260 citations), Economics and Econometrics (213 citations) and Soil Science (136 citations). Published in Econometrica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3982/ecta7749.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026