The Unemployment Volatility Puzzle: Is Wage Stickiness the Answer?

478 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2009, received 478 indexed citations. Written by Christopher A. Pissarides covering the research area of Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (445 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (210 citations) and General Health Professions (62 citations). Published in Econometrica.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.3982/ecta7562 →

Countries where authors are citing The Unemployment Volatility Puzzle: Is Wage Stickiness the Answer?

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Unemployment Volatility Puzzle: Is Wage Stickiness the Answer?. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Unemployment Volatility Puzzle: Is Wage Stickiness the Answer? with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Unemployment Volatility Puzzle: Is Wage Stickiness the Answer? more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Unemployment Volatility Puzzle: Is Wage Stickiness the Answer?

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Unemployment Volatility Puzzle: Is Wage Stickiness the Answer?. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Unemployment Volatility Puzzle: Is Wage Stickiness the Answer?.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3982/ecta7562.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026