Measuring Group Differences in High‐Dimensional Choices: Method and Application to Congressional Speech
- Journal
- Econometrica
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.3982/ecta16566 →Countries where authors are citing Measuring Group Differences in High‐Dimensional Choices: Method and Application to Congressional Speech
This map shows the geographic impact of Measuring Group Differences in High‐Dimensional Choices: Method and Application to Congressional Speech. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Measuring Group Differences in High‐Dimensional Choices: Method and Application to Congressional Speech with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Measuring Group Differences in High‐Dimensional Choices: Method and Application to Congressional Speech more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Measuring Group Differences in High‐Dimensional Choices: Method and Application to Congressional Speech
This network shows the impact of Measuring Group Differences in High‐Dimensional Choices: Method and Application to Congressional Speech. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Measuring Group Differences in High‐Dimensional Choices: Method and Application to Congressional Speech.
About Measuring Group Differences in High‐Dimensional Choices: Method and Application to Congressional Speech
This paper, published in 2019, received 195 indexed citations . Written by Matthew Gentzkow, Jesse M. Shapiro and Matt Taddy covering the research area of Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (102 citations), Political Science and International Relations (71 citations) and Communication (42 citations). Published in Econometrica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3982/ecta16566.