The Macroeconomic Impact of Microeconomic Shocks: Beyond Hulten's Theorem
- Authors
- David BaqaeeEmmanuel Farhi
- Journal
- Econometrica
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.3982/ecta15202 →Countries where authors are citing The Macroeconomic Impact of Microeconomic Shocks: Beyond Hulten's Theorem
This map shows the geographic impact of The Macroeconomic Impact of Microeconomic Shocks: Beyond Hulten's Theorem. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Macroeconomic Impact of Microeconomic Shocks: Beyond Hulten's Theorem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Macroeconomic Impact of Microeconomic Shocks: Beyond Hulten's Theorem more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Macroeconomic Impact of Microeconomic Shocks: Beyond Hulten's Theorem
This network shows the impact of The Macroeconomic Impact of Microeconomic Shocks: Beyond Hulten's Theorem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Macroeconomic Impact of Microeconomic Shocks: Beyond Hulten's Theorem.
About The Macroeconomic Impact of Microeconomic Shocks: Beyond Hulten's Theorem
This paper, published in 2019, received 208 indexed citations . Written by David Baqaee and Emmanuel Farhi covering the research area of General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (169 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (110 citations) and Finance (29 citations). Published in Econometrica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3982/ecta15202.