Liberation Technology: Mobile Phones and Political Mobilization in Africa
- Authors
- Marco ManacordaAndrea Tesei
- Journal
- Econometrica
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.3982/ecta14392 →Countries where authors are citing Liberation Technology: Mobile Phones and Political Mobilization in Africa
This map shows the geographic impact of Liberation Technology: Mobile Phones and Political Mobilization in Africa. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Liberation Technology: Mobile Phones and Political Mobilization in Africa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Liberation Technology: Mobile Phones and Political Mobilization in Africa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Liberation Technology: Mobile Phones and Political Mobilization in Africa
This network shows the impact of Liberation Technology: Mobile Phones and Political Mobilization in Africa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Liberation Technology: Mobile Phones and Political Mobilization in Africa.
About Liberation Technology: Mobile Phones and Political Mobilization in Africa
This paper, published in 2020, received 181 indexed citations . Written by Marco Manacorda and Andrea Tesei covering the research area of Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (111 citations), Communication (51 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (49 citations). Published in Econometrica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3982/ecta14392.