Trade Liberalization and Labor Market Dynamics
- Authors
- Rafael Dix-Carneiro
- Journal
- Econometrica
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.3982/ecta10457 →Countries where authors are citing Trade Liberalization and Labor Market Dynamics
This map shows the geographic impact of Trade Liberalization and Labor Market Dynamics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Trade Liberalization and Labor Market Dynamics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trade Liberalization and Labor Market Dynamics more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Trade Liberalization and Labor Market Dynamics
This network shows the impact of Trade Liberalization and Labor Market Dynamics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Trade Liberalization and Labor Market Dynamics.
About Trade Liberalization and Labor Market Dynamics
This paper, published in 2014, received 243 indexed citations . Written by Rafael Dix-Carneiro covering the research area of General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (195 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (153 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (57 citations). Published in Econometrica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3982/ecta10457.