Agarose Gel Electrophoresis for the Separation of DNA Fragments
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.3791/3923 →Countries where authors are citing Agarose Gel Electrophoresis for the Separation of DNA Fragments
This map shows the geographic impact of Agarose Gel Electrophoresis for the Separation of DNA Fragments. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Agarose Gel Electrophoresis for the Separation of DNA Fragments with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Agarose Gel Electrophoresis for the Separation of DNA Fragments more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Agarose Gel Electrophoresis for the Separation of DNA Fragments
This network shows the impact of Agarose Gel Electrophoresis for the Separation of DNA Fragments. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Agarose Gel Electrophoresis for the Separation of DNA Fragments.
About Agarose Gel Electrophoresis for the Separation of DNA Fragments
This paper, published in 2012, received 387 indexed citations . Written by Pei Yun Lee, Chih-Yuan Hsu and Yong Hoon Kim covering the research area of Plant Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (158 citations), Biomedical Engineering (55 citations) and Ecology (46 citations). Published in Journal of Visualized Experiments.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3791/3923.