Neural organization of the defensive behavior system responsible for fear
- Authors
- Michael S. Fanselow
- Journal
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.3758/bf03210947 →Countries where authors are citing Neural organization of the defensive behavior system responsible for fear
This map shows the geographic impact of Neural organization of the defensive behavior system responsible for fear. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neural organization of the defensive behavior system responsible for fear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neural organization of the defensive behavior system responsible for fear more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Neural organization of the defensive behavior system responsible for fear
This network shows the impact of Neural organization of the defensive behavior system responsible for fear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Neural organization of the defensive behavior system responsible for fear.
About Neural organization of the defensive behavior system responsible for fear
This paper, published in 1994, received 761 indexed citations . Written by Michael S. Fanselow covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (506 citations), Social Psychology (281 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (232 citations). Published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3758/bf03210947.