A Review of Chaotic Systems Based on Memristive Hopfield Neural Networks

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 96 indexed citations. Written by Hairong Lin, Chunhua Wang, Fei Yu, Jingru Sun, Sichun Du, Zekun Deng and Quanli Deng covering the research area of Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (54 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (46 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (33 citations). Published in Mathematics.

Countries where authors are citing A Review of Chaotic Systems Based on Memristive Hopfield Neural Networks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A Review of Chaotic Systems Based on Memristive Hopfield Neural Networks. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Review of Chaotic Systems Based on Memristive Hopfield Neural Networks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Review of Chaotic Systems Based on Memristive Hopfield Neural Networks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A Review of Chaotic Systems Based on Memristive Hopfield Neural Networks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A Review of Chaotic Systems Based on Memristive Hopfield Neural Networks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Review of Chaotic Systems Based on Memristive Hopfield Neural Networks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3390/math11061369.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026