A Deep Learning Model for Network Intrusion Detection with Imbalanced Data
- Journal
- Electronics
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.3390/electronics11060898 →Countries where authors are citing A Deep Learning Model for Network Intrusion Detection with Imbalanced Data
This map shows the geographic impact of A Deep Learning Model for Network Intrusion Detection with Imbalanced Data. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Deep Learning Model for Network Intrusion Detection with Imbalanced Data with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Deep Learning Model for Network Intrusion Detection with Imbalanced Data more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A Deep Learning Model for Network Intrusion Detection with Imbalanced Data
This network shows the impact of A Deep Learning Model for Network Intrusion Detection with Imbalanced Data. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Deep Learning Model for Network Intrusion Detection with Imbalanced Data.
About A Deep Learning Model for Network Intrusion Detection with Imbalanced Data
This paper, published in 2022, received 151 indexed citations . Written by Yanfang Fu, Yishuai Du, Zijian Cao, Qiang Li and Wei Xiang covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Networks and Communications. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Networks and Communications (133 citations), Artificial Intelligence (114 citations) and Signal Processing (65 citations). Published in Electronics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3390/electronics11060898.