Emergency Online Learning in Low-Resource Settings: Effective Student Engagement Strategies
- Journal
- Education Sciences
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010024 →Countries where authors are citing Emergency Online Learning in Low-Resource Settings: Effective Student Engagement Strategies
This map shows the geographic impact of Emergency Online Learning in Low-Resource Settings: Effective Student Engagement Strategies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emergency Online Learning in Low-Resource Settings: Effective Student Engagement Strategies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emergency Online Learning in Low-Resource Settings: Effective Student Engagement Strategies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Emergency Online Learning in Low-Resource Settings: Effective Student Engagement Strategies
This network shows the impact of Emergency Online Learning in Low-Resource Settings: Effective Student Engagement Strategies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Emergency Online Learning in Low-Resource Settings: Effective Student Engagement Strategies.
About Emergency Online Learning in Low-Resource Settings: Effective Student Engagement Strategies
This paper, published in 2021, received 125 indexed citations . Written by Samar Helou, Mei‐Rong Alice Chen, Rwitajit Majumdar and Hiroaki Ogata covering the research area of Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (88 citations), Computer Science Applications (33 citations) and Clinical Psychology (32 citations). Published in Education Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010024.