Machine Learning Methods for Cancer Classification Using Gene Expression Data: A Review
- Authors
- Aleksandar Vakanski
- Journal
- Bioengineering
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10020173 →Countries where authors are citing Machine Learning Methods for Cancer Classification Using Gene Expression Data: A Review
This map shows the geographic impact of Machine Learning Methods for Cancer Classification Using Gene Expression Data: A Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Machine Learning Methods for Cancer Classification Using Gene Expression Data: A Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Machine Learning Methods for Cancer Classification Using Gene Expression Data: A Review more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Machine Learning Methods for Cancer Classification Using Gene Expression Data: A Review
This network shows the impact of Machine Learning Methods for Cancer Classification Using Gene Expression Data: A Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Machine Learning Methods for Cancer Classification Using Gene Expression Data: A Review.
About Machine Learning Methods for Cancer Classification Using Gene Expression Data: A Review
This paper, published in 2023, received 97 indexed citations . Written by Aleksandar Vakanski covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (58 citations), Artificial Intelligence (34 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (15 citations). Published in Bioengineering.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10020173.