Mathematics Anxiety: What Have We Learned in 60 Years?

513 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2016, received 513 indexed citations. Written by Ann Dowker, Amar Sarkar and Chung Yen Looi covering the research area of Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Statistics and Probability. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (330 citations), Education (251 citations) and Statistics and Probability (196 citations). Published in Frontiers in Psychology.

Countries where authors are citing Mathematics Anxiety: What Have We Learned in 60 Years?

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mathematics Anxiety: What Have We Learned in 60 Years?. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathematics Anxiety: What Have We Learned in 60 Years? with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathematics Anxiety: What Have We Learned in 60 Years? more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Mathematics Anxiety: What Have We Learned in 60 Years?

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Mathematics Anxiety: What Have We Learned in 60 Years?. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Mathematics Anxiety: What Have We Learned in 60 Years?.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00508.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026