Cancer statistics for adults aged 85 years and older, 2019

265 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2019, received 265 indexed citations. Written by Carol DeSantis, Kimberly D. Miller, William Dale, Supriya G. Mohile, Harvey Jay Cohen, Corinne R. Leach, Ann Goding Sauer, Ahmedin Jemal and Rebecca L. Siegel covering the research area of Oncology, Epidemiology and Geriatrics and Gerontology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (124 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (50 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (44 citations). Published in CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.

Countries where authors are citing Cancer statistics for adults aged 85 years and older, 2019

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cancer statistics for adults aged 85 years and older, 2019. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cancer statistics for adults aged 85 years and older, 2019 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cancer statistics for adults aged 85 years and older, 2019 more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Cancer statistics for adults aged 85 years and older, 2019

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Cancer statistics for adults aged 85 years and older, 2019. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cancer statistics for adults aged 85 years and older, 2019.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3322/caac.21577.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026