The Botryosphaeriaceae: genera and species known from culture
- Journal
- Studies in Mycology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.3114/sim0021 →Countries where authors are citing The Botryosphaeriaceae: genera and species known from culture
This map shows the geographic impact of The Botryosphaeriaceae: genera and species known from culture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Botryosphaeriaceae: genera and species known from culture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Botryosphaeriaceae: genera and species known from culture more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Botryosphaeriaceae: genera and species known from culture
This network shows the impact of The Botryosphaeriaceae: genera and species known from culture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Botryosphaeriaceae: genera and species known from culture.
About The Botryosphaeriaceae: genera and species known from culture
This paper, published in 2013, received 769 indexed citations . Written by Alan J. L. Phillips, Artur Alves, Jafar Abdollahzadeh, Bernard Slippers, Michael J. Wingfield, J.Z. Groenewald and P.W. Crous covering the research area of Plant Science, Cell Biology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cell Biology (739 citations), Plant Science (659 citations) and Molecular Biology (266 citations). Published in Studies in Mycology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.3114/sim0021.